Re: [aerogear-dev] [Android] Android project structure for final

On Mar 1, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> On Mar 1, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>> On 28/02/2013, at 20:07, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> aerogear-android-tests: This will house all of the Aerogear tests for >>>>> Android. >>>> >>>> You mean moving all the tests? Can't this be only for integration tests, and the unit tests stay on the aerogear-android project? >>> >>> I'd also prefer to have the unit tests for each of the libs >>> (aerogear-android + aerogear-android-support) being in there. >> >> I can see one reason to have the unit tests in a separate project. I assume both aerogear-android and aerogear-android-support would have pretty much identical tests since their functionality should >> be the same, right? It would be a pain to have to maintain multiple sets of the same tests across projects. >>> > > Not sure about the details, BUT... you misread. I don't think I did. > > Unit tests belong to the library. I am -1000 on having a 'unit test' > only broject. Normally I would agree with this but what I'm saying is that this is a unique situation. These libraries will have the same functionality unless I'm misunderstanding the point of separating aerogear-android and aerogear-android-support. I'm mostly just pointing out the fact that these projects will likely have identical unit test suites so maintaining them will be a pain.

That is all. If Summers and any other Android folks don't mind maintaining two identical test suites in different projects, fine by me. > > Integration tests are different, they _should_ be separated Agree > > -M > >>> Only integration tests should be a totally independent project, >>> consuming the other libs (aerogear-android + aerogear-android-support) >>> and having tests against em. >>> >>> -M >>> >>> >>>> >>>> -- qmx >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev