On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello Daniel
I really buy into your idea.
We definitively need more consistent documentation on AeroGear features
with concrete and simple exemple (like we started in cookbook).
The idea is clean up our documentation, write a UNIQUE document explaining
how to build our lib and apps. Looks like
ActionBarSherlock<http://actionbarsherlock.com/usage.html>
- Prereq
- Build
- Usage
In all README we will link for this document (on
ag.org) and add specific
things for the app
Let's refactor our documentation together and meake suure we go in the same
direction.
See Hylke thread on it [1]. As suggested by Hylke, let's group our
documentation per category/features: core, push, security, offline/sync. We
could have a general description of what the features is, some link to
specs etc..
+1 for reorganize this
Then the sample part. Each sample/recipe(from cookbook) should be well
documented and follow a similar template like you gist shown it.
I've done
similar with iOS-cookbook. One central readme [1] which list all recipes.
Each recipes [2] has is own documentation following the same template. We
ca work on unifying the template. I like prerequisites section,
install/build section common to both, you miss a short description of the
app and some ui flow with pictures would be nice and then a last sec ion we
we explain the main fatures we want ot demo.
The root document is not to explain how to use our features. It’s for
explain how to build our libs and apps.
We don’t have one central README and other specific for cookbook looks like
iOS, because for Android we have only one cookbook app. This application
has all our features. For each feature we have one activity (screen). This
makes the explanation very simple and focus on this feature. Each activity
(screens) explain one feature and each feature has a usage guide on the
ag.org ( <
http://aerogear.org/docs/guides/aerogear-android/>
http://aerogear.org/docs/guides/aerogear-android/))
A couple of questions on implementation though:
- Instead of just having links to cookbook, how can we embed in
asciidoc
or markdown? the sample documentation should belong to the cookbook repo.
- How are we going to publish read me info from cookbook into aerogear.orgrepo? a build
or some sort of automation will be good.
I think those questions have been answered above.
++
Corinne
[1]
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Website-restructur...
[1]
https://github.com/corinnekrych/aerogear-ios-cookbook/blob/master/README.md
[2]
https://github.com/corinnekrych/aerogear-ios-cookbook/blob/master/Xmas/Xm...
On Dec 9, 2013, at 11:20 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me> wrote:
> Summers and I tossed around the idea last week to create a 'root
document' how to build AeroGear android lib and apps.
>
> The idea is write a simple document that looks like ActionBar Sherlock
doc instead of having a huge doc with lots of repeated setup, have a setup
docs which branch from there
>
> Publish it on
aerogear.org and link all others (like README) with it
>
> My draft for it is here:
https://gist.github.com/danielpassos/4b4e694c1c71473b4f59
>
> wdyt?
>
> -- Daniel Passos
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev