Re: [aerogear-dev] Basic Authentication - Push

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org <mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote: Are we skipping PL now? https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server/blob/227ca43c6a4... I'm asking, because the PL have already implemented it. I did it for a few reasons. I thought about using some "extension" of the PL Agent (or a wrapper): Something like "MobileVariantAgent.java" That would have a variantID (similar to the login name) and a secret, stored as an attribute. Right now, what I really do is user the variantID and the secret and check if a) variant does exist and master password matches. For the PicketLink I am also a bit unsure if that here (stealing the session) is bad: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-204 so, I could "login" for variant "123" and have the chance to add "devices" for a different variant 122 (if that exists in the database). I am very open, to go with the default filter from PL, but the above was my motivation of doing what I did for: * Sender endpoint * MobileVariantInstance endpoint -Matthias -- abstractj _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev