Re: [aerogear-dev] [Android] Android project structure for final

On Mar 1, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: >> >> On 28/02/2013, at 20:07, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> aerogear-android-tests: This will house all of the Aerogear tests for >>> Android. >> >> You mean moving all the tests? Can't this be only for integration tests, and the unit tests stay on the aerogear-android project? > > I'd also prefer to have the unit tests for each of the libs > (aerogear-android + aerogear-android-support) being in there. I can see one reason to have the unit tests in a separate project. I assume both aerogear-android and aerogear-android-support would have pretty much identical tests since their functionality should be the same, right? It would be a pain to have to maintain multiple sets of the same tests across projects. >

> Only integration tests should be a totally independent project, > consuming the other libs (aerogear-android + aerogear-android-support) > and having tests against em. > > -M > > >> >> -- qmx >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev