On Aug 27, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Luke,
ad) Variants
it would be ideal if we could just use the same variant!
yea, it’s looking like it will be the same thing, we might just have to make a note of
it on the UI
ad) Compatibility
I would say we should preserve the compatibility with 1.x as long as it does not make
much efforts to keep both supported.
If it would be too much hassle, let's remove it in 1.1.
Chrome is updated pro-actively anyway, so no one will hear about the old API in few
months.
exactly, so maybe a warning or something
Cheers,
~ Lukas
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
now that the 1.0.0-final is pretty much out for the UnifiedPush Server, i’m starting to
look at the new API that Chrome apps use for sending push notifications.
the TL;DR of it is, it’s basically the same as Android now.( no more refresh tokens and
access tokens and such )
So the question is, do we need to have a deprecation period on what is currently there?
The v1 of the chrome pushMessaging api has become legacy and it is recommended to use the
new stuff.
https://developer.chrome.com/apps/cloudMessagingV1
While i have looked to deeply, it’s possible we can use the same “Variant” structure for
Chrome Apps, Since they will be using the same Network
wdyt?
-Luke
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev