Re: [aerogear-dev] [JS Doc] feedback on the new JS-Doc

On Oct 9, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: True. I will need to think of a different way of exposing them to the other modules without making them public. That could be fine. I might have to make AeroGear more than just a namespace and have the other modules implement AeroGear rather than just extend it and put those methods on the prototype. I'll have to think on it. Based on the previous point, I'll have to think on how to make that work. It could be useful but it's also a pretty standard thing in JS so not a big deal if we don't expose it as many app devs already add something like that to their apps. True. It probably helps to have the docs inline but don't need to include them in the generated docs. I can just add @private to them and they won't be included. Thanks! Thanks, merged.