Re: [aerogear-dev] Android keys (Re: AeroGear Push Message Format)

Summers, Passos, wondering if we should/could honor "android" specific keys as well (similar to the iOS keys that we "honor") See: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/blob/master/docs/specs/aerogear-... -Matthias On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > reminder, that ID is just the primary key :-) > > meaningful are "pushApplicationID" and "variantID" > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > >> Luke >> >> once this landed, it will be "pushApplicationID" and "variantID" - the >> ID is than meaningless (at least for PushEE server). >> >> -M >> >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: >> >>> plus plus >>> >>> On May 31, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-86 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On May 31, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> somehow the device needs to say: "I belong to android variant" >>>> >>>> besides the @Id /PK, we can have a second field / column that >>>> represents: >>>> * PushAppID >>>> * VariantID >>>> >>>> Yup. Having these would solve that >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Was that your question? >>>> >>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013, Lucas Holmquist wrote: >>>> >>>>> something that i was thinking about after doing some examples is that >>>>> i'm not sure how i feel about using the PK's of each table as the >>>>> identifier to register/broadcast clients. >>>>> >>>>> We are sort of giving meaning to data that really shouldn't have >>>>> meaning. it should really only be used to identify the row. It might be >>>>> better to have another key on each table/object that is the identifier. >>>>> >>>>> So in one of the examples i did, the app on the device will register >>>>> the device with the push server, but i needed to also include the id of >>>>> the variant instance >>>>> >>>>> i guess i'm thinking if someone migrates their database, these keys >>>>> could get messed up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> wdyt? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On May 28, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Corinne Krych < >>>>> corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> in selective push is: >>>>> ==> variant: iOS + alias: mwessendorf >>>>> a valid criteria too? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> yes. let me update the related doc(s) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28 May 2013 08:51, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28 May 2013 08:48, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> TYPO: >>>>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) >>>>> + deviceType:iPadMini + alias: mwessendorf >>>>> or >>>>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) >>>>> + deviceType:iPhone + alias: mwessendorf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>>>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Corinne Krych < >>>>> corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> When doing selective push query, is there any overlap between mobile >>>>> variant (which I understand like mobile type which contains certificates) >>>>> and device type? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> MobileVariant (or call it type) is something like "Android", or "iOS". >>>>> deviceTypes would be iPad, iPod, iPhone, iWatch :) - or "Android >>>>> Table", "Andrpid phone", android what not >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sure.... ideally there are several variants: >>>>> - iOS iPhone 5 optimised app in the app store >>>>> - iOS iPhone 4s optimised app in the app store >>>>> - iOS iPhone 3 optimised app in the app store >>>>> - iOS iPad mini optimised app in the app store >>>>> etc :) >>>>> >>>>> But, if there is only one variant, it's totally valid to install an >>>>> iOS application (from the appstore), on an iPad and an iPhone; >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Both aimed at defining categories. >>>>> Are those categories defined and fixed in the spec or can they be >>>>> extended? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand categories, here >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can we do a selective push based on mobileType=mobile variant and >>>>> alias=john@gmail? >>>>> >>>>>