I'm totally aware of it and that's the reason why I'm trying to
communicate at each change.
The branch keycloak.js won't be merged until we stabilize it. The reason
to come to the mailing list and give a heads up is to share a problem to
be solved instead of keep it to myself.
Thanks
On 2014-06-17, Karel Piwko wrote:
We definitely need a way how get bearer token from auth server
without a form
popping out if we are going to remove HTTP Basic. UPS is supposed to be used
also by other applications using REST endpoints apart from Admin UI. E.g. you
want to show all iOS installations on variant FooBar in your own dashboard
application.
Sender is the same case, your application might want to send a message via UPS.
It might be using either JavaSender or direct REST calls. Ability to authorize
your app non-interactively is crucial here.
Karel
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:06:48 -0300
Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
> Good morning peeps,
>
> First I would like to thank Bill Burke, Stian, Sebastien and Lukas for
> dedicating their time helping with Keycloak integration.
>
> I think we are almost done, this is the current branch:
>
https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js.
> And now most of issues were gone and is also possible to display the current
> logged in user.
>
> Now I'm working on fix the sender endpoint, to be more precise we need
> to remove the HTTP basic authentication for sending push messages
> now that most of the endpoints are protect by Keycloak. If you try to
> send a push message based on my branch you will see the basic
> authentication form atm.
>
> If you have a better idea, I'm all ears.
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev