On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:26, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:12:36 +0300
Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much Karel!
>
> We will try both of them.
I've just figured out that Luke is using Mocha -
http://visionmedia.github.io/mocha/. Looks nice as well.
Mocha is nice but I would prefer that we use the same framework across all of JS. I
imagine Luke scaffolded the app with Yeoman (could be wrong) and that pulled in mocha. I
would prefer we stick with QUnit across the JS bits but feel free to try all 3 suggested
as they are all good choices.
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yahor,
>>
>> QUnit or Jasmine is a pretty good choice. Aerogear uses QUnit from what
>> I've
>> seen so far and QE definitely goes QUnit :-)
>>
>> Karel
>>
>> [1]
https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-qunit
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:07:33 +0300
>> Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich(a)exadel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all!
>>>
>>> I am from the JBoss Tools team, and I am developing CordovaSim - a
>>> simulator for Cordova-based hybrid projects.
>>> Now we are looking for a framework for JavaScript testing. We are
>> planning
>>> to use it mostly to test various Cordova API methods.
>>>
>>> Which framework do you use in the Aerogear development?
>>>
>>> How about Jasmine?
>>>
>>> I will appreciate any suggestions.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev