Re: [aerogear-dev] Web Push protocol WGLC

On Tuesday, 14 June 2016, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi all, > > Update for the latest week: > > We discussed the questions, which I asked previously (follow previous > links). Most of them are closed now. > > In addition here were a few new contributions/questions: > > - Discussion about "Prefer: wait=0 for Receiving Push Message > Receipts": > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00607 > - Fixing typo: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/118 > - Replacing Push Messages just with Topic. Why? > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00618 > > Brian Raymor (one of the authors of Web Push protocol) added me to the > Acknowledgements part of the draft :) Small achievement) > https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/#rfc.section.10 > > https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commit/319d3f6ee5e5741f22a... > > wow! this is huge!! keep up the good work! Thanks for these updates, really appreciated! > We are also trying to schedule a time slot with him for chatting to > discuss some issues and he asked me about attendance on IETF96 this July: > https://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html > > Best regards, > Idel Pivnitskiy > -- > Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> > GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Hi Idel, >> >> thanks a lot, this is good feedback on the status! >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy < >> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Community provides a good feedback and a lot of changes were merged. WG >>> decided to postpone WGLC for a 2 weeks to resolve all issues. >>> >>> New discussion threads were initiated by me: >>> >>> 1. Define a list of headers, which must be transmitted to the UA: >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00578 >>> 2. Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts: >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00579 >>> 3. When UA should send an acknowledgement? >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00580 >>> 4. 414 Request-URL Too Long: >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00581 >>> 5. Try to deliver receipt at least once, even if TTL expired: >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00582 >>> 6. Delivery receipt may be sent before AS request delivery: >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00597 >>> >>> For some of them new GitHub issues was created. Also here is one issue >>> without sending messages to the Web Push mailing list: >>> >>> Prefer: wait=0 for Receiving Push Message Receipts: >>> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/113 >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Idel Pivnitskiy >>> -- >>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Bevenius < >>> daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> > Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My >>>> suggestion will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], >>>> because they merged a few changes this week [4]. >>>> I'll try to catch up on the spec this week (hard to find the spare >>>> time to do this at the moment). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3 June 2016 at 12:51, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Looks like Web Push WG ready for the WGLC [1]. They gathers feedback >>>>> as soon as possible. >>>>> >>>>> I've initiated a few thread: >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00549 >>>>> 2. >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00559 >>>>> >>>>> Also I want to ask them some questions about not clear parts of the >>>>> draft for me. >>>>> >>>>> Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion >>>>> will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they >>>>> merged a few changes this week [4]. >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00524 >>>>> [2] https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/ >>>>> [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-05 >>>>> [4] https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commits/master >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy >>>>> -- >>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev