Re: [aerogear-dev] Documenting Server Side Interfaces

> I would say we just need error responses documented for all of the methods and also include 401 which would be returned if they are not authorized to access a secure endpoint no matter the method. Thanks Kris, I've added error response code to the doc. Any thoughts on where we should put this information? Does it belong to the spec section or aerogear.org (http://aerogear.org), for example adding a section with the header "Server Side Specifications" and a "REST API" link? On 6 November 2012 14:04, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com (mailto:kris@redhat.com)> wrote: > Dan, > > This looks really nice! I would say we just need error responses documented for all of the methods and also include 401 which would be returned if they are not authorized to access a secure endpoint no matter the method. > > Kris > > On Nov 6, 2012, at 6:55 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com (mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com)> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I've started to document the server side interfaces here: > > https://gist.github.com/4023803 > > > > Let me know if you can think of things that are missing. > > > > Thanks, > > > > /Dan _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org) > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org) > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org) https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev