Hello, as said in the other email thread earlier this week ([1]) there is a bug in the last JBoss AS 7.1 release (see [2]), that basically means the server works properly only on EAP6.x and WildFly. Because of that, I am wondering about removing the -as7 module (see [3]), on our MASTER branch. For the 1.0.x branch, I'd like to keep it, for EAP usage reasons.

What do you guys think? -Matthias [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-October/009435.html [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4694 [3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/master/serve... _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 08:43 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hello, > > as said in the other email thread earlier this week ([1]) there is a bug in > the last JBoss AS 7.1 release (see [2]), that basically means the server > works properly only on EAP6.x and WildFly. > > Because of that, I am wondering about removing the -as7 module (see [3]), > on our MASTER branch. For the 1.0.x branch, I'd like to keep it, for EAP > usage reasons. Sounds reasonable to me if there is an easy way how to backport from -wf in 1.1.x (or 2.0.x) to -as7 in 1.0.x in case there is issue that potentially affect both wars. Which should be pretty easy looking at architecture of UPS ;-). > > What do you guys think? > > -Matthias > > [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-October/009435.html > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4694 > [3] > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/master/serve... > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev