https://github.com/blog/2051-protected-branches-and-required-status-checks I think this would be good for us to implement _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

same here. I think perhaps we "just" protect master? On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > I feel 50/50 about it, sometimes we have to rebase and fix some mess in > the Git tree. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> https://github.com/blog/2051-protected-branches-and-required-status-checks >> >> I think this would be good for us to implement >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > > -- > "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato > - > @abstractj > - > Volenti Nihil Difficile > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

I think if we really need this, it's because were doing it wrong. — abstractj PGP: 0x84DC9914 On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > +1 makes sense to enable this for master and maintenance brances > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> same here. I think perhaps we "just" protect master? >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> I feel 50/50 about it, sometimes we have to rebase and fix some mess in >>> the Git tree. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/blog/2051-protected-branches-and-required-status-checks >>>> >>>> I think this would be good for us to implement >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -- >>> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato >>> - >>> @abstractj >>> - >>> Volenti Nihil Difficile >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Erik Jan > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev