Re: [bv-dev] Jigsaw module name

I know it's late to reply to this, but seems fine. I'd consult the Java EE EG just to make sure they don't want to use a javax.ee prefix (which seems odd, though). Using the predominant/"root" package for the module is what I'd recommend too. Regards, Michael On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > > Hi, > > Java 9 is still in the works, so it's too early to put anything final > into the BV spec, but should we add a recommended module name for API > modules? > > My thinking is to have a short appendix stating: > > "Implementors that wish to provide the Bean Validation API in form > of a Java 9 module, > should use the module name "javax.validation". A mandatory module > name will be > defined in a future revision of this specification". > > A commonly agreed on module name is required by Jigsaw to ensure > different API modules (e.g. the reference one and the one provided by > Apache) are interchangeable. > > I expect further changes to the spec to support Java 9 down the road > (e.g. to resolve message bundles in client modules and to provide a > way for passing in a Lookup granting private access (see [1]), but > it's nothing we can bake into the spec yet. > > Thoughts? > > --Gunnar > > [1] > http://in.relation.to/2017/04/11/accessing-private-state-of-java-9-modules/ > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev