+1 for #3
regards,
gerhard
2012/2/28 Michael Nascimento <misterm(a)gmail.com>
3 seems by far the best since it can be strongly typed-checked
through
a processor, as mentioned.
Regards,
Michael
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> On 26 févr. 2012, at 12:21, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
>> @Emmanuel: For the first BV 1.1 draft I suggest to leave out
>> cross-parameter constraints. This shouldn't change the general scheme
>> of method validation, so we could add that in a later draft revision.
>
> That or you describe succinctly options 2 and 3 for feedback.
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev