Hi, There is a proposal for using the new reflective parameter names for executable validation: http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-498/ It's there for a while and I've moved forward by creating a PR with the spec change: https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation- spec/pull/114 Can you please let me know about any remarks by the end of the week. Silence will be taken as "no objections". Not that I expect much controversy on this one :) Thanks, --Gunnar _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev

No objections :) Thanks Gunnar! Regards, Marco On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Michael Nascimento <misterm(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > LGTM. > > Regards, > Michael > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There is a proposal for using the new reflective parameter names for >> executable validation: http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-498/ >> >> It's there for a while and I've moved forward by creating a PR with the >> spec change: https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation-spe >> c/pull/114 >> >> Can you please let me know about any remarks by the end of the week. >> Silence will be taken as "no objections". Not that I expect much >> controversy on this one :) >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Gunnar >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> beanvalidation-dev mailing list >> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev