Re: [gsoc] score for submission

Thank you! On 13 Apr 2012, at 16:44, Anil Saldhana wrote: > Mircea, > I will look at how the proposal got a low rating. > > Regards, > Anil > > On 04/13/2012 10:30 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: >> Guys, >> >> I've had an 1h long chat with this guys Sunimal and he's a very >> sharp and committed person. I personally feel that it's very unfair >> for his effort and involvement to be rated the way it is. So would >> it be possible for the author of the evaluation to ping me offline >> to have a chat on that? >> >> Thanks, >> Mircea >> >> >> [1] >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/sunima... >> >> On 12 Apr 2012, at 14:07, Mircea Markus wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've been reviewing some infinispan submissions to GSoC and >>> two[1][2] of them are rated with the minimal score (1/5). >>> I'm very surprised by that rating, especially in the case of [1] >>> which is a solid submission with a good level of detail. >>> I know the rating is anonymous, but I'd really appreciate >>> some details on why both submissions were rated like that. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Mircea >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/sunima... >>> [2] >>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/anton_... >> >