Re: [infinispan-dev] [Discussion] TimeService implementation

>> When recovery is enabled, the recovery manager creates a second cache. >> Someone may want to replace the Clock/TimeService for the "normal" cache >> and left the default implementation in the "recovery" cache. > > ^ Why would an end-user want to replace the Clock/TimeService? > > Remember what I said in my previous email: I can see someone changing the service implementation for testing reasons, and in that case, a global clock/timer service that's swapable via system property would work just fine IMO. I don't know. I'm being pessimist and assuming that someone in the world as a dark use case and needs to replace the service.