On 13 March 2014 22:05, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mar 13, 2014, at 20:59, Ales Justin <ales.justin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> - also important to notice that we will have both an Hadoop and an Infinispan
cluster running in parallel: the user will interact with the former in order to run M/R
tasks. Hadoop will use Infinispan (integration achieved through InputFormat and
OutputFormat ) in order to get the data to be processed.
>
> Would this be 2 JVMs, or you can trick Hadoop to start Infinispan as well -- hence
1JVM?
good point, ideally it should be a single VM: reduced serialization cost (in vm access)
and simpler architecture. That's if you're not using C/S mode, of course.
?
Don't try confusing us again on that :-)
I think we agreed that the job would *always* run in strict locality
with the datacontainer (i.e. in the same JVM). Sure, an Hadoop client
would be connecting from somewhere else but that's unrelated.
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev