Hi Bela,
Alpha1 does not exist in GitHub. Instead you have 3.3.0.Alpha2 =)
So, can I start to use it?
Thanks
Pedro
On 2/8/13 2:31 PM, Bela Ban wrote:
On 2/8/13 3:23 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> Hi Bela,
>
> Do you think we can have this particular improvement in JGroups by 18
> Feb? That week Pedro, Dan and I are going to start integrating TO
> protocols in ISPN and this is a requirement for it.
It is done and part of the alpha1 release...
> On 8 Feb 2013, at 12:41, Pedro Ruivo wrote:
>> On 2/8/13 12:26 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>>> On 7 Feb 2013, at 11:36, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7 Feb 2013, at 11:29, Bela Ban<bban(a)redhat.com
>>>> <mailto:bban@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I meant to say that this is up to you guys to decide inwhich
>>>>> Infinispan
>>>>> release this will be used, but it will be available in JGroups 3.3.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the strategy/schedule for 6 and 5.3 anyway ?
>>>> 5.3 will be relatively quick, just an incremental release mainly
>>>> targeting reviewing and putting in a few contribs on the queue.
>>>> E.g., we're hoping for 5.3 to be feature-complete in no more than 2
>>>> months.
>>>>
>>>> 6 is where we get to break API - specifically with the new
>>>> packaging, etc.
>>>>
>>>> But this seems like a pretty important feature/fix so it may make
>>>> sense to get this into 5.3.
>>> Pedro - please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>> This feature (or the alternative Pedro has already implemented in
>>> his branch) is used be the TO code that we'll integrate in 5.3. Se
>>> in order to have TO in ISPN we need these jgroups improvements in.
>> yes, I'll need it. otherwise, I have to create another RpcCommand to
>> send back the response generated by the other thread
> Cheers,
> --
> Mircea Markus
> Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org<http://www.infinispan.org>)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev