Yeah, that is my question. In conclusion, Mapper/Reducer instances
should be passed to CDI container for resolution once they are migrated
to execution nodes, but before they are executed on those nodes....
On 11-12-20 12:29 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
Are you asking what else needs to be added to the Mapper and Reducer
interfaces to make them CDI-friendly so that implementations can have stuff injected? I
suspect nothing need be done except that on the receiving node, if these implementations
are annotated as CDI beans, then they should be passed to the CDI container for proper
setup before being used.
On 20 Dec 2011, at 14:00, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> Sure,
>
> I'd like to hear Pete's opinion here. Can we inject pretty much anything
> from application scope or do we have to do something special in Mapper
> and Reducer to prepare objects that can be injected? I'd rather leave
> interfaces as they are and use injection mechanism to inject objects
> needed by implementors of Mapper and Reducer. Today it is cache,
> tomorrow people will ask for something else...and it seems to me
> injection mechanism is the way to go here!
>
> Pete?
>
> Vladimir
>
> On 11-12-20 10:55 AM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Vladimir, for you? :)
>>
>> On 20 Dec 2011, at 13:21, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 December 2011 14:07, Manik Surtani<manik(a)jboss.org> wrote:
>>>> Yup, I agree. Care to create JIRAs for these two? I think the first one
(adding a cache reference to the task) should be for 5.1.0.
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev