On 22 Oct 2012, at 09:13, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Galder Zamarreño
<galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Galder, what JDK are you using?
java version "1.6.0_35"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_35-b10-428-11M3811)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.10-b01-428, mixed mode)
> OpenJDK 1.7 uses EmptyIterator.EMPTY_ITERATOR since 2007:
>
>
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/annotate/37a05a11f281/src/share/...
Good that the figured out this is non-sense.
> I don't have JDK 1.6 sources on hand to check, but I don't think it's
worth optimizing for such an old version anyway.
Why not? We support JDK 1.6, so nothing stops them from running it.
Until we baseline on JDK7 (or 8), I'd leave it in.
My point was that it is a really big change,
Why? The patch was trivial. Implementing it is easy, and then doing a search and replace
on the codebase again resulted in a pretty small patch.
and further it imposes a burden on anyone writing code with
collections in Infinispan.
Is it that hard for a reviewer to spot? :) Maybe even write a script to check and warn
for this.
I'm sure we will spend non-trivial amounts of time during reviews
pointing out places there the author should have used InfinispanCollections instead of
Collections...
I would be willing to go for it if a benchmark showed a significant increase in
performance after the change, but you didn't mention any benchmarks, so I guessed that
you didn't see a big difference...
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic <vblagoje(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Cool! Did not know about this! Is this original idea or others are
> already doing this?
> On 12-10-19 8:31 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Re:
https://github.com/galderz/infinispan/commit/0609207d13216de81d77ff51dc20...
> >
> > Please avoid using these JDK methods where possible. I've created
alternative versions in InfinispanCollections util class that provide a better
implementation.
> >
> > The problem with the JDK versions is that even if these collections are
immutable, if you wanna iterate them (i.e. for(X : emptySet) ), they'll create a brand
new Iterator every time they're looped, and that generates useless garbage.
> >
> > The InfinispanCollections versions of emptyX will return a constant singleton
iterator which avoids this problem, and avoids the need for client code to check if the
collection is empty before looping.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Galder Zamarreño
> > galder(a)redhat.com
> >
twitter.com/galderz
> >
> > Project Lead, Escalante
> >
http://escalante.io
> >
> > Engineer, Infinispan
> >
http://infinispan.org
> >
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
http://red.ht/data-grid