On Feb 6, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Galder ZamarreƱo <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Jan 31, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 31 Jan 2013, at 12:37, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
>>> I don't think that encouraging scala code is good purely for maintenance
reasons. If there's a choice, it should be java. Not saying that learning a new
language is not cool - but in practice people are a bit put off by maintaining Scala code.
Its not only about what the writer of the code prefers as a language: it's more
important what the maintainers of the code
>>> will has to work with.
>>
>> Would such maintainers also be put off by new language features (lambdas) in Java
8 when we (eventually) baseline to it? :-)
> It's really NOT the same thing: any decent java programmer keeps up with all the
enhancements in Java.
> What I might not want to - as an ISPN programmer - is to keep up with the language
enhancements in Scala. And I might need to do that because of Scala language enhancements
used in ISPN.
^ I wonder whether C programmers thought the same way 20 years ago.
20 years ago? I'm pretty sure Bela said this last week.
Besides, it's all JavaScript these days. Scala is old and busted ;)
-alan