On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:49, Scott Marlow wrote:
I posted a message on the as7-dev ml
(
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-as7-dev/2011-May/002254.html),
about switching to use the TransactionSynchronizationRegistry.
Does Infinispan currently register Transaction synchronization objects?
yes
Does Infinispan currently register synchronizations via
TransactionSynchronizationRegistry (TSR)?
no, we register synchronizations through
transaction.registerSynchronization
I'm trying to get a sense for, what would happen if container managed
(AS7) session beans were registered with the active JTA transaction via
the TSR.
If AS7 switches to use the TSR, I think that Infinispan might need to
ensure that it doesn't attempt to register with the TX too late.
right. One way
to go is by making the registration code pluggable.
See
http://pastie.org/1836698 for an example of what would happen if a
TSR synchronization object is already present and someone tries to
register a TX synchronization after tx.commit has been started.
hmm, this stack
trace shows an exception being thrown by the Synchrnoization.beforeCompletion object.
Doesn't look like the TransactionManager throws the exception not allowing the sync to
be registered.
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev