2009/11/9 Manik Surtani <msurtani(a)redhat.com>:
I can't think of any tests that create CacheManagers in different
threads and join the same group. I guess this would be tricky in our parallelised test
environment since the framework changes network IP and port ranges based on the thread
running the test, so that tests running in parallel don't see/affect each other.
Could this be your problem? Does your problem occur in a test run in the Infinispan test
suite? To prove it perhaps you could write a standalone test or class if this is the
case.
Cheers
Manik
I'm having these problems even when running my test alone, and I am
not extending other tests, so I don't think it's interacting with
other caches. I also killed every other java process :-/
Will try again soon, and show you the code if it fails again. Thanks
for your support!
Sanne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sanne Grinovero" <sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com>
To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Monday, 9 November, 2009 12:39:15 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Releasing 4.0.0.CR2
Hi Manik,
I've been able to fix the things I wanted to change in the Lucene
directory, but the new tests I produced revealed some other problem,
basically it looks like I can't join a new cache on an existing group.
Still looking into that, I am suspecting it might have something to do
with my environment (thread number limitations/network security). I am
setting up a dev environment on another pc and cleaning up my laptop
to reproduce; hard to say if for Wednesday this will work fine.
Could you point me to some core test creating new cachemanager
instances in different threads? I'm particularly interested in new
cachemanagers joining and being removed periodically; usually the
cachemanagers are all created in a before-test phase (in same thread,
quite fast one after the other).
thanks,
Sanne
2009/11/9 Manik Surtani <msurtani(a)redhat.com>:
> Hello all.
>
> How does everyone feel about cutting 4.0.0.CR2 this week? I think we have some
important fixes in place:
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/ydb4ucd
>
> including an API one (yes, I know I hate myself for doing this so late) - ISPN-251
>
> Anyway, how do people feel about getting their open issues in by close of Wednesday?
What do people have pending?
>
> Noel - you reckon you could have the code part of ISPN-123 in place by then?
>
> Sanne - what's the state of the Lucene dir provider?
>
> Vladimir - I don't think ISPN-245 has any impact on this release since it is an
internal API and not used at the moment anyway, although if it is in place it would be
good to change the Query module to use it - a good showcase.
>
> Galder/Mircea - anything else pending? Galder let's chat re: ISPN-259 on IRC.
>
> Cheers
> Manik
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev