Thanks Slorg1,
that's exactly what I was looking for, and indeed I'm debugging an
issue on older versions. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll make a
test and compare implementation behaviours.
Sanne
On 9 December 2011 14:56, Slorg1 <slorg1(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 09:53, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
> Thanks Vladimir,
> I can do that as a short term solution, but do you think we could have
> Infinispan care for it in the future?
> I don't like to mandate wrapping all invocations to Infinispan in a
> try catch block looking for such errors, and maybe others.
I am using 5.1.0 BETA 5 and when members are suspected I do not get
the exception.
Infinispan takes care of it for me.
Regards,
Slorg1
--
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email ?
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev