Re: [infinispan-dev] (additional use case for WF8) Removing Infinispan dependency on the Hibernate-Infinispan module in 4.x
On 4 June 2013 09:52, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 6/4/13 10:44 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> I think we would hit problems where the JPA EE container/subsystem side
>> interacts with the Infinispan (system) module (probably EJB3 code as
>> well.)
>
>
> Right, I realize that, but there might be a solution coming we call
> "grafting" JGRP-1613
Good you used the conditional tense. I looked into this and I'm currently
not convinced this will be needed, or can be added to JGroups. Let's discuss
this further at Red Hat Summit next week.
Right, but even if that where not coming I don't think that should
stop users from being
able to start an independent JGroups stack in the scope of their application
(at their risk).
> basically it should expose virtually independent channels so that
> multiple services
> needing an "owned" channel can use them without conflicts, but still
> sharing
> some protocols. So in the specific case of this discussion, people could
> reuse the ports, making it easier to configure and possibly faster to
> boot, but also
> reuse the cluster topology definition and failure detection, making it
> less awkward to use as in such
> a case you really don't want the topology from the AS to be out of sync
> with the
> topology used by some application cache.
>
> Sanne
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org)