On 25 May 2010, at 16:26, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 25 May 2010, at 14:15, Mircea Markus wrote:
>>>
>>> But, I'd be concerned about an Infinispan thread that's needed
>>> for doing a lot of critical work during a view change getting tied up
>>> making a ton of notifications.
>>
>> ^^ Yeah that's my concern. If during a rehash we need to stop at every entry
that is being moved and issue a notification, that could be costly and really slow down
the rehashing process.
> Can't we register an *async* notification listener on ViewChanged ?
You'd still have a *lot* of notifications being queued up for the notification
executor since you will have 1 event *per entry* that is moved.
this would still
happen in the same JVM as this information is needed. Just that we offer this as a
service, so that users(AS being one of them) won't have to write this code.
Could be thousands, tens of thousands in cases.
All other notifications will be severely delayed (depending on your async notifier
executor threadpool size)
If you have an big enough thread pool (actually at least 2
threads) this should be no issue - and this should be made clear to the user.
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev