On 6/2/09 3:23 PM, Bela Ban wrote:
I do *not* think a message from a member can squeeze in *before* a
VIEW because view installation is synchronous. However, you're right,
a message can squeeze in after a VIEW and before an unblock() is
received. But IMO that's fine I guess. Or do you see any issues here ?
That message gets dropped by FLUSH :( as things stand right now. That is
the question, what should we do? Should we wait for a latch to open by
unblock(with some timeout i guess) or should we let the messages pass up
the stack freely and forget this whole latch business?
Let me think about implications as well....