On 2/6/13 3:58 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
On 6 Feb 2013, at 15:37, Galder ZamarreƱo wrote:
>>>> I don't think that encouraging scala code is good purely for
>>>> maintenance reasons. If there's a choice, it should be java. Not
>>>> saying that learning a new language is not cool - but in practice
>>>> people are a bit put off by maintaining Scala code. Its not only
>>>> about what the writer of the code prefers as a language: it's more
>>>> important what the maintainers of the code
>>>> will has to work with.
>>>
>>> Would such maintainers also be put off by new language features
>>> (lambdas) in Java 8 when we (eventually) baseline to it? :-)
>> It's really NOT the same thing: any decent java programmer keeps up
>> with all the enhancements in Java.
>> What I might not want to - as an ISPN programmer - is to keep up
>> with the language enhancements in Scala. And I might need to do that
>> because of Scala language enhancements used in ISPN.
>
> ^ I wonder whether C programmers thought the same way 20 years ago.
Personally I don't believe Scala is the next big thing as it doesn't
have a "killer" feature, e.g. OOP from C -> C++ or GC from C++ -> Java.
+1000.
Let the flame war start (Galder with his lighter against us with flam
throwers) :-)
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (
http://www.jgroups.org)