On Sep 12, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
I've added a new table as suggested by Galder, and sent a pull
request
to constrain Query in the range I just defined [1]
For this case we only have a single byte to share across all commands.
Is it reasonable to reserve 100 values for Infinispan core, and blocks
of 20 for needing modules?
1 -
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/526
No need to reserve for Infinispan core cos that's indexed differently to the
externally provided commands. Same thing happens for externally defined Externalizers.
What you need to be worrying about is that you're not using same ids as other external
commands.
Blocks of 20 sounds good for commands/modules.
Sanne
On 12 September 2011 12:48, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I've just updated the table at the bottom of
>>
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Plugging+Infinispan+With+User+...
>>
>> to reserve a range for usage of custom externalizers in Hibernate Search.
>>
>> I'm also going to need custom commands; do we need to similarly
>> reserve ranges for Command IDs ?
>
> We should have. It should be documented in
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Writing+custom+commands+in+Inf...
>
>>
>> Sanne
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache