Re: [infinispan-dev] Keeping track of locked nodes

>> Cool. Mircea, reckon we can patch this quickly and with low risk? Or is it high risk at this stage? > I don't think it's a good moment for this right now. I'm not even convinced that this is the way go, as it might be cheaper to cache this information than to calculate it when needed. Just to clarify, I wasn't reporting a contention point or a performance issue. I was just puzzled by the design as it's very different than what I was expecting. I think we should move towards a design for which we don't really consider the locks to be positioned on a specific node, they should be free to move around (still deterministically, I mean on rehash). Not asking for urgent changes!