Re: [infinispan-dev] TOB/TOA integration

Sounds good to me, we should have a little more breathing room after the NBST alpha to look at the state transfer integration. Cheers Dan On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus(a)jboss.com <mailto:mircea.markus@jboss.com>> wrote: Hi guys, I've just had a chat with the CloudTM team(CC) around the integration of TOB/TOA[1] into Infinispan. Here are some points: - the TOB and TOA code has been reviewed in detail by us. The only part missing is the state transfer integration - there's not a lot of sense in integrating TOB/TOM over the existing state transfer as we would not back port that to 5.1 and it would be dropped in 5.2 - CloudTM would rebase the TOB/TOA work on top of the alpha NBST[2](ATM planned at the end of next week/3 Aug) and we'll integrate that - first releases of the TOB/TOA would be marked as experimental in 5.2 How does that sound? Cheers, Mircea [1] TOA used to be referred to as TOM (M from multicast). In JGroups terminology that's an Anycast, so we decided to be consistent with that and use TOAnycast. [2] https://community.jboss.org/wiki/Non-blockingStateTransfer _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev