On 24 Apr 2012, at 01:53, Manik Surtani wrote:
Mircea,
When you wrote the Hot Rod client, you abstracted the transport away so we could have
alternate network implementations, right?
Yes, that was the idea behind it.
The reason I ask is that at some point we should look at not only an
NIO impl (I know you had one that you experimented with some while back) but also a JDK7
NIO2 one, and benchmark the three.
Agreed. I'd expect an NIO/NIO2 client to handle much better the async requests from
client to the server than the current IO client which is optimised for sync operations.