On 04/13/2010 05:08 AM, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 13 Apr 2010, at 10:54, Mircea Markus wrote:
>>
>> since this will *not* work. The cache still primarily is a collection of K ->
V mappings and in the above case the last 2 lines will effectively overwrite the 1st 2
lines.
> "name" will only appear once in the cluster, (on different location
though), right?
Yes, and hence the effective "overwriting" of the previous name.
> Generally speaking I'm curious on how this scenario is handled:
> node A: cache.inGroup("a").put("key","something");
> node B: . assertEquals("something" ,cache.get("key")); //this
assert is correct
The interceptor would create these mappings on a put:
K -> G
G -> AtomicMap{K -> V}
What if K itself is an AtomicMap (which in the session case being
discussed with Vladimir Ralev, it will be)?
and for a get:
return get(get(K)).get(K)
so in your example, after the put, you will find:
"key" -> "a"
"a" -> AtomicMap{"key" -> "something"}
Now when you do the get, the interceptor would:
grpId = get("key")
atomicMap = get(grpId)
return atomicMap.get("key")
"All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of
indirection" - David Wheeler
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss by Red Hat