I know, we can just attach the class loader to the cache!
Okay, just kidding, but Galder is right, this conversation is going in
circles. We already discussed that in this thread and a number of
points were raised for and against.
On 05/16/2011 01:20 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
What about a helper that just returns a cache with a specific
classloader from a cache?
cache.withLoader(cl).get(K key)
-a
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com
<mailto:galder@redhat.com>> wrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I don't like the TCCL either, so I'll repeat my suggestion from two
> weeks ago to just have:
>
> Cache c = cacheManager.getCache( cacheName, classLoader );
>
> sounds reasonable to me to have the application declare it's
intentions once ?
>
> BTW I don't like
>
> "cache.get(K key, Class<V> clazz)"
>
> as we're not speaking only about the get(K) method, but about many
> methods and this will explode the number of method of Cache; on the
> other hand I think it;s acceptable to have a single Cache instance
> used by a single application/classloader. You can still have multiple
> applications share the same underlying cache and use different
> classloaders:
Guys, we're going around in circles. As I said the other week, you
can't assume 1 cache = 1 classloader cos for example in the
Hibernate 2LC all entities will be stored in a single cache as
opposed to today where we have a cache per entity. And if all
entities are stored in the same cache, we potentially have a cache
that contains data belonging to multiple cache loaders. And the
reason for all this is cos we don't support asymmetric clusters.
Could someone start a design wiki to grab all the requirements?
>
> getCache( cacheName, classLoader ) would return a delegate to the
> original cache, having a specific marshaller in the invocation
context
> as Trustin was suggesting.
>
> Cheers,
> Sanne
>
>
> 2011/5/16 Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com <mailto:pmuir@redhat.com>>:
>>
>> On 16 May 2011, at 18:20, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 12, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:18 PM, David Bosschaert
<david(a)redhat.com <mailto:david@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/05/2011 17:54, Dan Berindei wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Pete
Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com
<mailto:pmuir@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Were we developing for OSGi I would certainly agree
with
you. However in many environments today we can reasonably expect the
TCCL to be set and to be able to load the classes we need. So whilst
making it part of the API is the safest option, it's also making
complicated an API for the sake of the few at the cost of the many.
Further this also seems kinda nasty to me. We know the class (and
hence bundle/module) when we put the object into Infinispan,
therefore why do we require people to respecify this again?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David, can we not actually do something here akin to
what
we are discussing for Weld? Whereby we can serialize out the bundle
id and then find the correct CL based on that when we deserialize.
>>>>>> What if the object is a java.util.ArrayList? Each element
in
the list
>>>>>> could belong to a different bundle, so you'd have to
write a
bundle id
>>>>>> for every element in the list.
>>>>> Yes, if you know the Bundle-SymbolicName and Version (or the
Bundle ID)
>>>>> you can find its classloader.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other question, if you're passing in a class object
then you can
>>>>> obtain its classloader and hence the bundle where it came
from. But, and
>>>>> I think this is what Dan allused to above, is it always true
that the
>>>>> class your passing in comes from the bundle that you need to
have or
>>>>> could it also come from one of its parent class loaders?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Exactly David, sorry if my message was a little cryptic. I
think in
>>>> order to handle every case properly you would have to go
through the
>>>> entire object graph being stored in the cache in order to find
all the
>>>> classloaders/bundle ids that you will need on get().
>>>>
>>>> That seems like a lot of overhead to me, and forcing the user to
>>>> provide the classloader doesn't seem that bad in comparison.
Perhaps
>>>> we should use something other than a thread-local for this
though, so
>>>> that users can do a onto the result of a
>>>> cacheManager.getCache("A").usingClassLoader(A.class) and
never
have to
>>>> provide the classloader again.
>>>>
>>>> In fact I think this is a good idea for the invocation flags we
>>>> already have, too. It would involve creating lots of overloads in
>>>> CacheDelegate with a PreInvocationContext parameter and a new
>>>> CacheDelegateWithContext class to invoke those methods, but
the public
>>>> API would remain the same.
>>>
>>> No matter how I look at it, putting a classloader in a thread
local makes me shiver.
>>
>> I also wonder why we want do this, given we already have a
construct called the Thread Local Context Classloader ;-)
>>
>> Either we use that, or use some other mechanism.
>>
>>> Just imagine the mayhem you can cause if you "forget" to
clear
the thread local.
>>>
>>> I've done enough of Apache Commons Logging support to
understand that you should limit the references to classloaders to
the minimum, particularly in system classes/infrastructure.
>>>
>>> If we need to end up forcing users to register classloaders in
these scenarions, we need to do it in such way that either:
>>>
>>> - we can detect these leaks (it might be a bit primitive now
but old JBoss JCA code had an interesting way of discovering
unclosed open connections)
>>>
>>> - if we give you on trying to detect them, the impact of a leak
is reduced as much as possible.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> --
>>> Galder Zamarreño
>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev