I agree with Alan here. Maven Central is a free "download area", so I
wouldn't give it up for free. BTW, what is the point of creating and not
shipping them?
I would lean towards to removing them completely or limiting the number of
use cases to the minimum e.g. we shouldn't support using
infinispan-embedded and jcache; if jcache is essential it should be inside
infinispan-embedded; the same for Spring integration modules - either we
should put them in uber jars or say that you can use Spring integration
with small jars.
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:05 AM Alan Field <afield(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Wasn't the ability to add a single dependency to a project to
start using
Infinispan the whole purpose for the uber jars? I'm not trying to make an
argument for keeping them, because I know they have caused many issues. I
just think that if we are going to remove them from Maven, then there
should be a way to achieve the same easy developer on boarding that uber
jars were supposed to provide. Whether this is Maven project templates, or
something else doesn't matter.
Thanks,
Alan
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tristan Tarrant" <ttarrant(a)redhat.com>
> To: infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 4:05:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Why JCache embedded has core as provided
dependency
>
> I think we should turn off maven deployment for uber jars.
>
> Tristan
>
> On 6/7/17 5:10 PM, Gustavo Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:galder@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > As far as I see it:
> >
> > * infinispan-embedded should never be a dependency in a Maven
project.
> >
> > * No uber jars should really be used as Maven dependencies because
> > all the exclusion that fine grained dependencies allow you to do
> > goes out of the window when all classes are inside a jar. This is
> > not just theory, I've personally had such issues.
> >
> > * Uber jars are designed for Ant or other build tool users that
> > don't have a dependency resolution engine in place.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > p.s. I thought we had already discussed this before?
> >
> >
> >
> > I totally agree. In addition, uberjars should not be an osgi bundle or
a
> > jboss module, for similar reasons.
> >
> > P.S: Even Ant has a dependency mgmt available, which is Ivy.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gustavo
> >
> > --
> > Galder Zamarreño
> > Infinispan, Red Hat
> >
> > > On 7 Jun 2017, at 11:50, Sebastian Laskawiec <
slaskawi(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:slaskawi@redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > The change was introduced by this commit [1] and relates to this
> > JIRAs [2][3]. The root cause is in [3].
> > >
> > > Imagine a scenario where you add JCache module to your together
> > infinispan-embedded. If your classpath was constructed in such a
way
> > that infinispan-embedded was before infinispan-core (classpath is
> > scanned from left to right in standalone apps), we could get a
> > relocated (uber jars move some classes into other packages) logger.
> > That caused class mismatch errors. It is worth to mention that it
> > will happen to all relocated classes, logger was just an example.
> > And we need to relocate them, since a user might want to use his
> > own, newer version of DMR or any other library. So there's no
> > perfect solution here.
> > >
> > > Now a lot of time passed since then and we changed quite a few
> > things. So this topic probably needs to be revisited.
> > >
> > > So the first question that we should ask, shall we allow putting
> > jcache and infinispan-embedded together on the classpath. If the
> > answer is yes, I believe it should stay as it is (since the user
> > always have a choice whether he wants to use jcache with or without
> > uber jar). The same question needs to be asked for Spring modules
as
> > well as all cache stores. The behavior needs to be consistent
across
> > all those modules.
> > >
> > > If the answer is no (which is also valid because jcache is
> > already present in embedded uber jar), we should migrate all JBoss
> > Logging references to Infinispan Common Logging (as Tristan did
here
> > [4]) and we can make infinispan-core as a compile time dependency
to
> > jcache. Even though migrating to Infinispan logger is not
necessary,
> > this way we won't break users app which used infinispan-embedded +
> > jcache approach. Of course the same applies to Spring and Cache
> > stores modules.
> > >
> > > I think the latter approach deserves some exploration. I would
> > vote for moving that way.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sebastian
> > >
> > > [1]
> >
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/commit/720f158cce38d86b292e1ce77...
> > <
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/commit/720f158cce38d86b292e1ce77...
>
> > > [2]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6295
> > <
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6295>
> > > [3]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6132
> > <
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6132>
> > > [4]
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/4140/files
> > <
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/4140/files>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:19 AM Galder Zamarreño
> > <galder(a)redhat.com <mailto:galder@redhat.com>> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Re:
> >
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/9417#discussion_r1203...
> > <
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/9417#discussion_r1203...
>
> > >
> > > Stéphane makes a good point there, why did we make core provided
> > dependency? It does feel a bit of a pain that anyone that depends
on
> > jcache embedded also needs to depend on core.
> > >
> > > Any more details behind this decision?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > --
> > > Galder Zamarreño
> > > Infinispan, Red Hat
> > >
> > > --
> > > SEBASTIAN ŁASKAWIEC
> > > INFINISPAN DEVELOPER
> > > Red Hat EMEA
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infinispan-dev mailing list
> > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> > <
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infinispan-dev mailing list
> > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> >
>
> --
> Tristan Tarrant
> Infinispan Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev