On 26 Jan 2012, at 22:42, Manik Surtani wrote:
> I really didn't want to do this, but it looks like a 5.1.1 will be necessary.
The biggest (critical, IMO, for 5.1.1) issues I see are:
>
> 1.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1786 - I presume this has to do with a bug
Mircea spotted that virtual nodes were not being enabled by the config parser. Which
meant that even in the case of tests enabling virtual nodes, we still saw uneven
distribution and hence poor performance (well spotted, Mircea).
> 2. Related to 1, I don't think there is a JIRA for this yet, to change the
default number of virtual nodes from 1 to 100 or so. After we profile and analyse the
impact of enabling this by default. I'm particularly concerned about (a) memory
footprint and (b) effects on Hot Rod relaying topology information back to clients. Maybe
10 is a more sane default as a result.
There is one now:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1801
> 3.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1788 - config parser out of sync with XSD!
> 4.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1798 - forceReturnValues parameter in the
RemoteCacheManager.getCache() method is ignored!
I'm sure there will some others as community starts reporting! but that's good as
we can provide a quick release for the main issues.
> In addition, we may as well have these "nice to have's" in as well:
>
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1787
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1793
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1795
these ^^ are already in master so we can include them straight away.
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1789
this looks like a low prio, as doesn't have an impact on the functionality
Agreed, but it is such a trivial fix and it greatly affects usability (who wants to see
such verbose and misleading log messages?)
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1784
pull request sent, so IMO makes sense.
>
> What do you think? Anything else you feel that is crucial for a 5.1.1? I'd like
to do this sooner rather than later, so we can still focus on 5.2.0. So please respond
asap.
As everybody is in the performance min set, I think the following issues, in this order,
would be a quick win:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-825
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-317
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1748
-1 to all 3. I think these are all non-trivial and shouldn't be in a point release -
even if it is a week's worth of work.
Cheers
Manik
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org