On 23 Apr 2013, at 16:37, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 4/22/13 6:46 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 22 Apr 2013, at 16:46, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> would the read only partition be wiped out and repopulated during
>> merge?
>
> Naively, yes. But as Dan pointed out, if a key K only exists in the
> minor partition (primary and backups), then just wiping the minor
> partition nodes will result in data loss.
>
> A more sophisticated algorithm would just wipe keys in the minor
> partition that also exist in the major partition.
I think this would be good enough for a lot of scenarios.
> An *even* more sophisticated algorithm would only wipe keys in the
> minor partition that also exist in the major partition, that have
> changed since the partition occurred. Hence the vector clocks.
Even better. What would you do in a conflict case ? Throw the conflict
at the user who has to resolve it ? Always prefer the data from the
primary partition ?
Why would a conflict happen? Only the primary partition is allowed to update data after a
split.
- M
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
http://red.ht/data-grid