Re: [infinispan-dev] [Discussion] TimeService implementation

On May 2, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Pedro Ruivo <pedro(a)infinispan.org&gt; wrote: >>> When recovery is enabled, the recovery manager creates a second cache. >>> Someone may want to replace the Clock/TimeService for the "normal" cache >>> and left the default implementation in the "recovery" cache. >> >> ^ Why would an end-user want to replace the Clock/TimeService? >> >> Remember what I said in my previous email: I can see someone changing the service implementation for testing reasons, and in that case, a global clock/timer service that's swapable via system property would work just fine IMO. > > I don't know. I'm being pessimist and assuming that someone in the world > as a dark use case and needs to replace the service. ^ We already have quite a big configuration… we should think twice about adding more stuff… :)