On 19 Oct 2012, at 17:40, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus(a)jboss.com> wrote:
On 19 Oct 2012, at 07:41, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> On 12-10-19 4:15 AM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>
>> You're right actually, the temporary cache created is transactional. it is
built in the CreateCacheCommand and relies on the DummyTransactionManager, might be better
to use batching perhaps? Or even not require for this cache to be transactional?
>>
>> Yes, we should keep such internal caches as simple as possible.
>>
> Mircea/Manik, it could be batch I believe. If you recall Mircea, you and I talked
about how to effectively move data across cluster deadlock free - we even agreed we should
blog post about it :-)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2156
>
> Mircea/Manik could I get some advice and code review for
MapReduceManagerImpl#combine?
Thanks Vladimir. The only change to make is CreateCacheCommand.create, configure the
cache to be batchable[1]. Then in the MapReduceManagerImpl#combine, don't use the
TransactionManager.beggin/commit but the batch API.
Is this in? Have we redone M/R not to rely on transactions and instead to use batching
yet? Vladimir?
- M
[1]
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Batching
>
> Thanks guys,
> Vladimir
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
http://red.ht/data-grid