On 31 Jan 2013, at 12:47, Bela Ban wrote:
On 1/31/13 1:37 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 31 Jan 2013, at 12:35, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:mmarkus@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>> I don't think that encouraging scala code is good purely for
>> maintenance reasons. If there's a choice, it should be java. Not
>> saying that learning a new language is not cool - but in practice
>> people are a bit put off by maintaining Scala code. Its not only
>> about what the writer of the code prefers as a language: it's more
>> important what the maintainers of the code
>> will has to work with.
>
> Would such maintainers also be put off by new language features
> (lambdas) in Java 8 when we (eventually) baseline to it? :-)
I don't think so. First, this will be a few years off anyway. Second,
this will not pose cross-language debugging problems. And third, even
Java+closures is still Java.
+1
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)