On 1 Apr 2009, at 11:30, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> So, the interface it implements is more appropriately named
>>>> (CacheRPCCommand). Perhaps there should be 2 separate
>>>> implementations, SingleRPCCommand, MultipleRPCCommand?
> <mailto:manik@jboss.org>
> Why do we need the SingleRPCCommand? Can't we replicated the
> aggregated command directly?
Nope. The container contains information on which cache to dispatch
the command to. I don't want this to be in every command since that
would duplicate the cache name in cases where > 1 command are in the
same replication envelope, such as a prepare message.
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.jbosscache.org
manik(a)jboss.org <mailto:manik@jboss.org>