On Mar 13, 2014, at 22:17, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
On 13 March 2014 22:05, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 20:59, Ales Justin <ales.justin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> - also important to notice that we will have both an Hadoop and an Infinispan
cluster running in parallel: the user will interact with the former in order to run M/R
tasks. Hadoop will use Infinispan (integration achieved through InputFormat and
OutputFormat ) in order to get the data to be processed.
>>
>> Would this be 2 JVMs, or you can trick Hadoop to start Infinispan as well --
hence 1JVM?
>
> good point, ideally it should be a single VM: reduced serialization cost (in vm
access) and simpler architecture. That's if you're not using C/S mode, of course.
?
Don't try confusing us again on that :-)
I think we agreed that the job would *always* run in strict locality
with the datacontainer (i.e. in the same JVM). Sure, an Hadoop client
would be connecting from somewhere else but that's unrelated.
we did discuss the possibility of running it over hotrod though, do you see a problem with
that?
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)