Re: [infinispan-dev] [Pull Request] Modular Classloading Compatibility
How about just using "as" and "using" instead of "asClass"
and
"usingClassloader"?
Consider something like the following which kind of looks like a dsl:
Foo f = cache.getAdvancedCache().as (Foo.class).using (classLoader).get (key);
T
________________________________
From: Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com>
To: infinispan -Dev List <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Mon, 2 May, 2011 21:08:47
Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] [Pull Request] Modular Classloading Compatibility
2011/5/2 Manik Surtani <manik(a)jboss.org>:
On 1 May 2011, at 13:38, Pete Muir wrote:
>>> As in, user API? That's a little intrusive... e.g., put(K, V, cl) ?
>>
>> Not for put, since you have the class, just get, and I was thinking
>> something more like:
>>
>> Foo foo = getUsing(key, Foo.class)
>
> This would be a pretty useful addition to the API anyway to avoid user casts.
Maybe as an "advanced" API, so as not to pollute the basic API? A bit like:
Foo f = cache.getAdvancedCache().asClass(Foo.class).get(key);
doesn't look much better than a cast, but is more cryptical :)
getting back to the classloader issue, what about:
Cache c = cacheManager.getCache( cacheName, classLoader );
or
Cache c = cacheManager.getCache( cacheName ).usingClassLoader(classLoader );
BTW if that's an issue on the API, maybe you should propose it to
JSR-107 as well ?
Sanne
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.5 KB)