Re: [infinispan-dev] configuring fetchInMemoryState for topology caches
On 21 May 2013, at 17:09, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I wouldn't want to deprecate CCL, I think it definitely has a
purpose - at least in invalidation mode.
The only use case I'm aware of for
invalidation is 2nd level cache and I don't think that needs a remote cache, Galder
wdyt?
Even in replication mode, having a lazy alternative to state transfer may be useful.
Maybe not for the topology cache, but it might make sense for large caches.
this makes me wonder: what would be the case in which one doesn't want to use state
transfer for a distributed/replicated cache.
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)