Re: [infinispan-dev] The windup of 6.0.0
On 10/17/13 4:48 PM, Dennis Reed wrote:
On 10/17/2013 05:26 AM, Bela Ban wrote:
> The other thing to look at is the apparent cost of Thread.setName(): if
> we cannot avoid thread many creations, we could experiment with *not*
> naming threads, although this is IMO not a good idea.
I agree that not naming the threads is a bad idea.
The thread names are vital for debugging -- both in log messages and in
thread dumps.
Not naming the threads would lose a whole lot of information.
I agree. This was not meant to be changed in JGroups, it was just sth to
try out to see whether perf gets better.
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org)