On 28 May 2013 13:02, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 12:52, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
> This notification feature seems to be very confusing, or at least I
> find it awkward to understand all special conditions.
- we expire things at two levels: memory and store (CacheStore.purgeExpired)
- we cannot tell the existing store to perform the notification callbacks so we'd
only notify for the entries in memory
I understand so far, but that means it's unreliable, so I'm wondering
in which use case that is acceptable.
Sanne
>
> My doubt is, is it worth it?
>
> Is there a reasonable use case, which works fine with all these limitations?
>
> I'd rather drop support for such notifications rather than having to
> deal with such non-deterministic behaviour.
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev