On 03/13/2014 12:35 PM, William Burns wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Pedro Ruivo
<pedro(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> #1 and #2 are ok to me but, IMO, the filter package should be in commons
> module
Sorry I forgot to detail why I said core. I originally planned for
commons package as well, however the KeyValueFilter class needs the
Metadata class, which doesn't live in the commons package. I didn't
want to separate the 2 filter classes. And unfortunately the Metadata
class relies on other classes in core, so that isn't easy to move over
either, but doable :( WDYT?
can you explain why the metadata is needed? I assumed that the key and
the value were the only objects needed.
>
> Cheers,
> Pedro
>
> On 03/13/2014 12:07 PM, William Burns wrote:
>> Recently while working on some ISPN 7 features, there were some public
>> API inconsistencies. I wanted to bring these up just in case if
>> someone had concerns.
>>
>> The first few are pretty trivial, but can cause compilation errors
>> between versions if user code implements these interfaces and defines
>> types.
>>
>> 1. The CacheWriter interface currently defines a delete(K key) method.
>> To be more inline with JCache and java.util.collections interfaces I
>> was hoping to change this to be delete(Object key) instead.
>> 2. The CacheLoader interface currently defines load(K key) and
>> contains(K key) methods. Similar to above I was hoping to change the
>> K type to be Object to be more inline with JCache and
>> java.util.collections interfaces.
>>
>> This last one is a bit more major, but currently we have 2 classes
>> that are named KeyFilter. One that resides in the
>> org.infinispan.notifications package and another that resides in the
>> org.infinispan.persistence.spi.AdvancedCacheLoader interface.
>>
>> 3. My plan is instead to consolidate these classes into 1 into a new
>> core org.infinispan.filter package. I would also move the new
>> KeyValueFilter class that was added for cluster listeners into this
>> package and their accompanying implementations.
>>
>> The first 2 is currently implemented as changes in
>>
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/2423. The latter I was
>> going to add into changes for
>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4068.
>>
>> Let me know what you guys think.
>>
>> - Will
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev