Manik Surtani wrote:
On 11 Apr 2009, at 08:16, Bela Ban wrote:
> I suggest you also take a look at performance and the size of te
> marshalled data, compared to the current marshalling code.
>
> I recall we had a bad experience with JBoss Serialization, which blew
> up our data
This is an important point. We need to make sure we aren't
unnecessarily inflating the number of bytes being transported, although
I seriously doubt we are. :-)
Perhaps a quick unit test to prove this? This marshaller [1] in our
test suite is a dummy marshaller that just uses java object streams.
Could be useful to compare resulting byte array sizes against.
Good idea. I could run the same smoke tests I have in
JBossMarshallerTest with MarshallerImpl and ObjectStreamMarshaller and
compare the sizes.
I'll see if I can get this done in time for alpha deadline tomorrow COB.
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat